1 Introduction

Reptiles, as the most species-rich group of terrestrial vertebrates, face significant conservation challenges due to a lack of comprehensive understanding of their extinction risks. Currently, only 45% of described reptile species have been assessed by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), with 20% of these species threatened with extinction and 19% classified as Data Deficient (Tingley et al., 2016). This knowledge gap underscores the urgent need for targeted conservation efforts and a deeper understanding of the ecological and evolutionary processes that influence reptile biodiversity. The integration of ecological and evolutionary insights into conservation strategies is crucial for addressing these challenges and ensuring the effective protection of reptile species (Vasconcelos et al., 2018).

Reptiles play a vital role in maintaining ecological balance and biodiversity. They are integral to food webs, acting as both predators and prey, and contribute to the regulation of insect populations and seed dispersal. Despite their ecological importance, reptiles are often underrepresented in conservation planning compared to other vertebrate groups such as birds and mammals. The global distribution of reptiles reveals unique richness patterns that differ from other taxa, highlighting the need for specific conservation actions to protect these species, particularly lizards and turtles, which are poorly represented in existing protected areas. Addressing these conservation needs is critical to preserving global biodiversity and ecosystem health (Gonçalves-Souza et al., 2022).

Ecology and evolution are fundamental to understanding the dynamics of species populations and their interactions with the environment. Incorporating ecological knowledge, such as species distribution and habitat requirements, alongside evolutionary insights, such as genetic diversity and adaptive potential, can enhance conservation strategies (Kay et al., 2016). For instance, using molecular and landscape tools to target evolutionary processes in reserve design can improve the effectiveness of conservation programs, particularly in regions with high levels of endemism. Additionally, understanding how species traits influence responses to environmental disturbances can guide conservation efforts by prioritizing species that are more vulnerable to ecological changes (Hu et al., 2020).

By examining the patterns and drivers of extinction risk, identifying knowledge gaps, and evaluating conservation strategies, this study seeks to provide a comprehensive framework for enhancing reptile conservation efforts. The expectation is to highlight effective conservation approaches and propose future research directions that incorporate both ecological and evolutionary perspectives, ultimately contributing to the development of more robust and adaptive conservation programs for reptiles worldwide.

2 The Ecological Framework for Reptile Conservation

2.1 Key ecological concepts relevant to reptile conservation

Reptile conservation is deeply intertwined with understanding their ecological roles and interactions within ecosystems. Reptiles, particularly in tropical regions, play significant roles in ecological processes such as gene dispersal, nutrient cycling, and ecosystem engineering. These roles are crucial for maintaining ecosystem functions and biodiversity (De Miranda, 2017). The global distribution of reptiles, which differs significantly from other vertebrate groups, highlights the need for targeted conservation efforts that consider their unique ecological contributions and distribution patterns.

2.2 Habitat requirements and niche specialization

Reptiles exhibit a wide range of habitat requirements and niche specializations, which are critical for their survival and conservation. For instance, the suitability of overwintering habitats for reptiles like freshwater turtles and snakes is influenced by ecohydrological and spatial complexities within wetlands. Additionally, the locomotor adaptations of Mesozoic marine reptiles illustrate the diversity of ecological niches occupied by reptiles, emphasizing the importance of habitat-specific conservation strategies (Gutarra et al., 2023).

2.3 Species interactions: predation, competition, and mutualism

Species interactions such as predation, competition, and mutualism are vital components of reptile ecology. These interactions can influence various aspects of reptilian life, including sleep patterns, which are shaped by ecological factors like predation risk and competition (Mohanty et al., 2021). Furthermore, the ecological roles of reptiles in tropical ecosystems, such as their involvement in trophic interactions, underscore their importance in maintaining ecological balance.

2.4 Climate change and its impact on reptile ecology

Climate change poses significant challenges to reptile ecology and conservation. Changes in climate can alter habitat availability and suitability, particularly in sensitive ecosystems like wetlands, which are crucial for the survival of many reptile species (Markle et al., 2020). Additionally, urban expansion and climate change can impact reptile populations by altering their habitats and ecological interactions, necessitating adaptive conservation strategies (Brum et al., 2022).

3 Evolutionary Perspectives in Reptile Conservation

3.1 Evolutionary adaptation and genetic diversity

Evolutionary adaptation and genetic diversity are critical components in the conservation of reptiles, as they underpin the ability of species to survive and thrive in changing environments. Genetic diversity is intimately tied to evolutionary fitness, influencing the demographic stability and resilience of populations (Dewoody et al., 2021). For instance, the study of the Christmas Island blue-tailed skink and Lister’s gecko highlights the importance of maintaining genetic diversity in captive populations to ensure successful reintroductions and long-term survival (Dodge et al., 2023). High genome-wide heterozygosity observed in these species suggests large historical population sizes, which are crucial for maintaining genetic health and adaptability.

Moreover, the integration of genomic, physiological, and morphological data can provide insights into local adaptations, such as those observed in the lizard Liolaemus fuscus, which has adapted to the extreme conditions of the Atacama Desert (Araya-Donoso et al., 2021). This study demonstrates how genetic divergence and specific physiological traits, like reduced evaporative water loss, contribute to the species’ survival in harsh environments. Such adaptations are essential for the conservation of reptiles, as they highlight the evolutionary processes that enable species to cope with environmental pressures.

3.2 Phylogenetic considerations in conservation planning

Phylogenetic diversity (PD) is increasingly recognized as a vital measure in conservation planning, offering insights into the evolutionary and functional aspects of biodiversity that are not captured by species richness alone. By incorporating phylogenetic metrics, conservation efforts can prioritize regions and species that represent significant evolutionary history, thereby preserving a broader spectrum of biodiversity. For reptiles, this approach is particularly important as they have been historically underrepresented in conservation planning.

The development of new metrics that combine PD with human pressure highlights the need to protect areas of high evolutionary significance that are under threat from anthropogenic activities (Gumbs et al., 2020). These metrics reveal that regions with high human impact often coincide with areas of irreplaceable reptilian diversity, necessitating targeted conservation actions. By focusing on phylogenetic diversity, conservation strategies can ensure the protection of evolutionary lineages that contribute to the overall resilience and adaptability of ecosystems.

3.3 Reproductive strategies and life-history evolution

Reproductive strategies and life-history evolution play a crucial role in the conservation of reptiles, as they influence population dynamics and species survival. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) offer promising tools for preserving reptile biodiversity by capturing and storing genetic material from select individuals (Perry and Mitchell, 2021). These technologies, including artificial insemination and genome resource banking, can help overcome natural and anthropogenic barriers to reproduction, thereby enhancing conservation efforts.

Furthermore, the study of squamate reptiles, which include lizards and snakes, reveals how ecological and developmental factors have driven their cranial evolution and diversification (Watanabe et al., 2019). The shared pattern of trait integration among these species suggests that selection has acted on conserved phenotypic architectures, allowing for diverse reproductive and life-history strategies. Understanding these evolutionary processes is essential for developing effective conservation plans that account for the unique reproductive adaptations of different reptile species.

3.4 The role of natural selection in population resilience

Natural selection plays a pivotal role in enhancing the resilience of reptile populations by driving adaptations that improve survival and reproduction in changing environments. The integration of genetic, physiological, and morphological data in studies of desert adaptation in reptiles, such as the Liolaemus fuscus, illustrates how natural selection shapes traits that are critical for coping with environmental challenges (Araya-Donoso et al., 2021). These adaptations, including reduced water loss and morphological changes, are vital for the persistence of species in arid habitats.

Moreover, the application of evolutionary principles in conservation strategies, such as selective breeding and the introduction of adaptive variants, can bolster population resilience (Pabijan et al., 2020). By leveraging natural selection, conservationists can enhance the adaptive capacity of reptile populations, increasing their chances of survival in the face of rapid environmental changes. This approach underscores the importance of considering evolutionary processes in conservation planning to ensure the long-term viability of reptile species.

4 Threats to Reptile Populations

4.1 Habitat destruction and fragmentation

Habitat destruction and fragmentation are significant threats to reptile populations worldwide. Urbanization and agricultural expansion lead to the loss of native vegetation, which is crucial for the survival of many reptile species. Reptiles are particularly sensitive to changes in landscape structure due to their limited dispersal abilities and reliance on specific habitat types (Delaney et al., 2021; Mulhall et al., 2022). The fragmentation of habitats can result in isolated populations, reducing genetic diversity and increasing the risk of local extinctions. In coastal regions, reptiles face additional pressures from coastal development, which further degrades their habitats.

4.2 Climate change-induced range shifts

Climate change is altering the distribution patterns of reptile species, with over half of the species experiencing a decrease in their distributional ranges (Li et al., 2024). This shift is driven by changes in temperature and precipitation patterns, which affect the availability of suitable habitats. Some species may benefit from climate change, experiencing an expansion in their potential distribution range, but the overall trend indicates an increased extinction risk for many reptiles (Razgour et al., 2017). Understanding the movement ecology and landscape connectivity is essential for predicting population persistence under these changing conditions.

4.3 Invasive species and disease transmission

Invasive species and disease transmission pose significant threats to reptile populations. Invasive species can outcompete native reptiles for resources, alter habitats, and introduce new diseases (Hu et al., 2020). The introduction of non-native species often leads to ecological disturbances that can have detrimental effects on native reptile populations. Additionally, diseases transmitted by invasive species can further exacerbate the decline of vulnerable reptile populations.

4.4 Overexploitation and illegal wildlife trade

Overexploitation and illegal wildlife trade are critical threats to reptile conservation. Many reptile species are targeted for their skins, meat, and as pets, leading to unsustainable population declines (Perry and Mitchell, 2021). The illegal pet trade, in particular, poses a significant risk to certain species, such as the sailfin lizards in the Philippines, which are heavily exploited despite their limited habitat protection (Siler et al., 2014). Conservation efforts must address these threats by implementing stricter regulations and enhancing enforcement to protect these species from exploitation.

5 Conservation Strategies Based on Ecological and Evolutionary Principles

5.1 Habitat restoration and connectivity planning

Habitat restoration and connectivity planning are crucial strategies for maintaining genetic diversity and reducing the risk of extinction in reptile populations. As human activities continue to fragment habitats, the connectivity between populations diminishes, leading to increased inbreeding and loss of genetic diversity. This can result in lower adaptability and higher probabilities of extirpation. Studies have shown that managed connectivity, such as through habitat corridors, can significantly reduce these risks by facilitating gene flow and maintaining genetic variability. For instance, an agent-based model demonstrated that increased connectivity prevented extirpation in a majority of critically endangered populations by reducing inbreeding depression and altering evolutionary trajectories (Lamka and Willoughby, 2023). This approach is particularly beneficial for small populations that are most vulnerable to genetic drift and inbreeding.

Moreover, integrating ecological and evolutionary processes in reserve design can enhance conservation outcomes. By using landscape and genetic tools, conservationists can target both species and lineage diversity, ensuring that protected areas encompass a wide range of genetic variability. This method has been applied successfully on islands, where high levels of endemism and restricted ranges make species particularly vulnerable to habitat fragmentation (Vasconcelos et al., 2018). Such strategies not only preserve current biodiversity but also enhance the long-term adaptability of populations by maintaining ecological and evolutionary processes.

5.2 Assisted gene flow and genetic rescue

Assisted gene flow and genetic rescue are strategies that aim to enhance genetic diversity and adaptive potential in small, isolated populations. These approaches involve the intentional movement of individuals or genetic material between populations to introduce new genetic variants and reduce inbreeding depression. For example, genomic assessments can identify locally adaptive genetic variations that are crucial for the survival of species in changing environments. By planning and monitoring these genetic interventions, conservationists can ensure that the introduced genetic diversity aligns with conservation objectives and enhances population resilience (Flanagan et al., 2017).

Genetic rescue has been shown to increase population fitness by introducing adaptive genetic variants, which can counteract the negative effects of inbreeding and genetic drift. However, it is essential to carefully plan these interventions to avoid maladaptation, where introduced genes may not be suited to the local environment. Studies have highlighted the importance of considering both short-term and long-term outcomes of genetic interventions, as well as the potential for maladaptation, to optimize conservation strategies (Derry et al., 2019). By balancing these factors, assisted gene flow and genetic rescue can effectively support the recovery and sustainability of threatened reptile populations.

5.3 Adaptive management strategies

Adaptive management strategies are dynamic approaches that incorporate ongoing monitoring and feedback to adjust conservation actions based on new information and changing conditions. These strategies are particularly important in the face of rapid environmental changes and uncertainties. By integrating ecological and evolutionary principles, adaptive management can enhance the effectiveness of conservation efforts for reptiles. For instance, the use of genomic tools to monitor adaptive genetic variation can inform management decisions and help identify conservation units that require specific interventions (Flanagan et al., 2017).

Adaptive management also involves the integration of in-situ and ex-situ conservation efforts. By combining data from both settings, conservationists can develop comprehensive management plans that address the needs of species across their entire life cycle. This approach has been successfully implemented in zoo-based conservation programs, where data on reproductive ecology and life history traits are used to inform both captive breeding and wild population management (Blais et al., 2022). By continuously evaluating and adjusting strategies, adaptive management ensures that conservation actions remain effective and responsive to new challenges.

5.4 Ex-situ conservation and captive breeding programs

Ex-situ conservation and captive breeding programs play a vital role in preserving reptile biodiversity, especially for species that are extinct in the wild or face imminent extinction. These programs provide a controlled environment where species can be bred and studied, offering insights into their reproductive ecology and behavior. For example, captive breeding of the narrow-headed gartersnake has revealed important aspects of its reproductive biology, which can inform both ex-situ and in-situ conservation efforts (Blais et al., 2022).

Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are increasingly being used in ex-situ conservation to enhance genetic diversity and overcome reproductive challenges. Techniques such as artificial insemination, gamete storage, and genome resource banking can capture and preserve genetic material from select individuals, facilitating genetic rescue and reintroduction efforts (Perry and Mitchell, 2021). These technologies are crucial for maintaining genetic diversity and adaptive potential in captive populations, ensuring their long-term viability and success in reintroduction programs.

6 Case Analysis: Integrating Ecology and Evolution in the Conservation of the Galápagos Marine Iguana

6.1 Species background and evolutionary significance

The Galápagos marine iguana (Amblyrhynchus cristatus) is a unique species, being the only extant marine lizard in the world. This species is endemic to the Galápagos Archipelago and has evolved remarkable adaptations that allow it to thrive in both terrestrial and marine environments. These adaptations include specialized feeding behaviors, primarily consuming algae from the rocky seafloor, and unique morphological traits such as modified snout configurations and increased muscle attachments in the skull, which distinguish it from other iguanids (Paparella and Caldwell, 2021).

The evolutionary history of the marine iguana is complex, involving incipient speciation and hybridization events. Genetic studies reveal strong population structures between islands, with evidence of both within-island speciation and between-island hybridization, which may enhance the species' evolutionary potential by integrating local adaptations into a common gene pool (Quezada and Steinfartz, 2015).

6.2 Ecological challenges facing the galápagos marine iguana

The Galápagos marine iguana faces several ecological challenges, primarily due to anthropogenic threats and environmental changes. The species is currently listed as Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List, with small effective population sizes on certain islands such as Floreana and San Cristobal, making them particularly susceptible to extirpation (MacLeod and Steinfartz, 2016).

Additionally, the iguanas exhibit size-related differences in foraging behavior, with larger individuals feeding subtidally and smaller ones intertidally, which may affect their thermoregulatory strategies and vulnerability to environmental changes. The iguanas' diet, primarily consisting of marine macroalgae, also shows geographical variation, with different subspecies consuming distinct algal species, potentially reflecting differences in algal abundance or dietary preferences (Anslan et al., 2021).

6.3 Conservation strategies implemented

Conservation strategies for the Galápagos marine iguana have increasingly incorporated molecular data to better understand and manage population structures. Recent studies have identified distinct population clusters across the archipelago, which are proposed as management units to prioritize conservation efforts. These strategies emphasize the need for accurate census size estimates and focus on islands with critically small populations. Additionally, the development of new microsatellite loci has provided powerful tools for monitoring genetic diversity and population dynamics, aiding in the formulation of effective conservation plans (MacLeod et al., 2012). Field-based radiographic imaging has also been explored as a non-invasive method to assess the health and physiological status of marine iguanas in their natural habitat (Figure 1), offering a novel approach to conservation research (Lewbart et al., 2018).

Figure 1 Dorsoventral radiographs of marine iguanas, demonstrating the measurements methods (Adopted from Lewbart et al., 2018) Image caption: The 20 cm calibration bar is visible adjacent to each iguana (top: 4653144B3E; bottom: no microchip ID). In Method 1 (a) snout-vent length (SVL) was measured using interconnected linear (regions of interest) ROIs bisecting the skull and vertebrae; this technique corrected for small angulations in the spine from the leading edge of the snout to the leading edge of the BB at the vent. In Method 2 (b) SVL was measured using a single linear ROI from snout to vent BB, with no correction for spinal angulation. (c,d) demonstrate the adjustment of these two measurement methods if the vent BB was not located so that it centrally bisected the vertebra at this level. In such cases, a transverse linear ROI was placed at the leading edge of the vent BB, and the caudal-most linear ROI measuring SVL was extended to the central aspect of this transverse ROI (Method 1 adjusted = c, Method 2 adjusted = d). In (a) angular mineral opaque fragments are visible within the gastrointestinal tract (arrowhead), consistent with ingested substrate. In (c) the frontal sinuses (arrow) are prominently visible, indicating foreshortening of the iguana, secondary to head position (Adopted from Lewbart et al., 2018)

6.4 Lessons Learned and Broader Implications

The conservation of the Galápagos marine iguana highlights the importance of integrating ecological and evolutionary perspectives in conservation programs. The species' unique evolutionary history, characterized by hybridization and speciation, underscores the need for conservation strategies that consider genetic diversity and population structure. The use of molecular tools has proven invaluable in identifying management units and informing conservation priorities, demonstrating the potential for similar approaches in other species with complex evolutionary backgrounds (Quezada and Steinfartz, 2015).

Furthermore, the ecological challenges faced by the marine iguana, such as dietary specialization and thermoregulatory behavior, illustrate the intricate interplay between environmental factors and species adaptation, offering insights into the broader implications of climate change and habitat alteration on marine and terrestrial ecosystems (Anslan et al., 2021).

7 Innovative Approaches in Reptile Conservation

7.1 Application of genomic tools in conservation

The application of genomic tools in reptile conservation has emerged as a pivotal strategy to address biodiversity loss and extinction risks. Genomic approaches provide insights into genetic diversity, population dynamics, and evolutionary histories, which are crucial for effective conservation planning. For instance, the use of genome-wide SNP datasets has been instrumental in understanding the diversification and adaptation of reptile species in specific environments, such as the Hajar Mountains in Arabia, where genomic data revealed high levels of within-mountain diversification and the impact of past climatic events on species assemblage (Burriel-Carranza et al., 2024). Similarly, the development of high-quality reference genomes for species like the Christmas Island blue-tailed skink and Lister's gecko has provided valuable information on genetic diversity and inbreeding patterns, which are essential for managing captive populations and planning reintroductions (Dodge et al., 2023).

Moreover, genomics has facilitated the identification of cryptic lineages and the assessment of genetic variation critical for the survival of endangered species. This is particularly important for reptiles, which often inhabit remote and understudied regions (Shaffer et al., 2015). Despite the potential of genomic tools, challenges remain in translating genomic data into practical conservation actions. There is a need for improved infrastructure, mature analytical methods, and the dissemination of successful case studies to bridge the gap between research and conservation practice.

7.2 Remote sensing and ecological monitoring

Remote sensing and ecological monitoring are innovative approaches that enhance the understanding and management of reptile habitats. These technologies allow for the large-scale assessment of habitat changes, species distributions, and ecological dynamics, which are critical for conservation efforts. For example, environmental DNA (eDNA) has been used to detect species presence and measure community diversity across various spatial and temporal scales. This method is particularly valuable for monitoring elusive or rare reptile species, providing data that can inform conservation listings and recovery planning (Nordstrom et al., 2022).

Additionally, integrating landscape and molecular tools has proven effective in reserve design, particularly on islands with high levels of endemism. By predicting species occurrences and mapping spatial phylogenetic patterns, conservationists can set more accurate targets for protecting both widespread and restricted-range species. This approach has been applied to Socotra Island, where it helped identify conservation gaps and guide local-scale planning (Vasconcelos et al., 2018). These technologies, when combined with traditional monitoring methods, offer a comprehensive framework for addressing the complex challenges of reptile conservation.

7.3 Citizen science and community involvement

Citizen science and community involvement are increasingly recognized as vital components of reptile conservation programs. Engaging local communities and citizen scientists in data collection and monitoring efforts can significantly enhance the scope and effectiveness of conservation initiatives. These participatory approaches not only increase the amount of data available for conservation planning but also foster a sense of stewardship and awareness among the public.

For instance, citizen science projects can help fill data gaps in regions where professional monitoring is limited, providing valuable information on species distributions, population trends, and habitat conditions. This is particularly important for reptiles, many of which are understudied and face significant threats from habitat loss and climate change (Tingley et al., 2016). By involving local communities in conservation efforts, programs can also address socio-economic factors that contribute to biodiversity loss, ensuring that conservation strategies are sustainable and culturally appropriate.

7.4 Integrating AI and machine learning in conservation decision-making

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning in conservation decision-making represents a cutting-edge approach to managing reptile populations and habitats. These technologies can process large datasets, identify patterns, and predict outcomes with high accuracy, making them invaluable tools for conservationists. AI and machine learning can be used to model species distributions, assess habitat suitability, and evaluate the impacts of environmental changes on reptile populations.

For example, machine learning algorithms can analyze remote sensing data to detect habitat changes and predict the effects of climate change on species distributions. This information can then be used to prioritize conservation actions and allocate resources more effectively. Additionally, AI can assist in the development of adaptive management strategies, allowing conservationists to respond quickly to emerging threats and changing conditions (Szabo et al., 2020). By harnessing the power of AI and machine learning, conservation programs can become more efficient and effective in achieving their goals.

8 Conclusions and Future Directions

8.1 The need for a holistic conservation approach

Reptile conservation requires a comprehensive approach that integrates ecological, evolutionary, and conservation practices. Current conservation efforts often overlook reptiles, despite their significant diversity and ecological roles. For instance, only 45% of reptile species have been assessed for extinction risk, with 20% threatened and 19% data deficient, highlighting the need for more inclusive conservation strategies (Tingley et al., 2016). Additionally, the global distribution of reptiles differs significantly from other vertebrates, necessitating targeted conservation actions, particularly for lizards and turtles. A holistic approach should address these gaps by incorporating ecological and evolutionary data into conservation planning, ensuring that all reptile species are adequately represented and protected.

8.2 Bridging the gap between ecology, evolution, and conservation practices

To effectively conserve reptiles, it is crucial to bridge the gap between ecological and evolutionary research and practical conservation efforts. Integrating molecular and landscape tools can enhance reserve design by targeting evolutionary processes, as demonstrated in studies on Socotran reptiles (Vasconcelos et al., 2018). Furthermore, incorporating regional ecological knowledge can improve the effectiveness of large-scale conservation programs by tailoring strategies to specific environmental associations and biogeographic regions (Kay et al., 2016). This integration can lead to more informed and adaptive conservation practices that consider both ecological dynamics and evolutionary histories.

8.3 Future research directions in reptile conservation

Future research should focus on addressing knowledge gaps and improving conservation methodologies. Environmental DNA (eDNA) offers a promising tool for detecting elusive species and measuring community diversity, which can be particularly valuable for reptiles (Nordstrom et al., 2022). Additionally, research should prioritize understanding the impacts of global climate change on reptile distributions, as over half of reptile species are experiencing range contractions due to climate change (Li et al., 2024). Studies should also explore the influence of species traits on population responses to environmental disturbances, which can guide conservation efforts by identifying species at higher risk (Hu et al., 2020). Expanding research to underrepresented regions and taxa will be essential for developing comprehensive conservation strategies.

8.4 Final remarks on the integration of scientific insights into practical conservation

Integrating scientific insights into practical conservation is vital for the effective protection of reptiles. This involves not only addressing current knowledge gaps but also applying innovative tools and methodologies to conservation practices. By leveraging advances in ecological and evolutionary research, conservation programs can be more adaptive and responsive to the needs of reptile species. Ultimately, a concerted effort to integrate these insights will enhance the resilience of reptile populations and contribute to the broader goal of biodiversity conservation.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend sincere thanks to two anonymous peer reviewers for their feedback on the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

The authors affirm that this research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Anslan S., Dalgo D., Reinhardt T., Peñafiel N., Guayasamin J., Páez-Rosas D., Vences M., and Steinfartz S., 2021, DNA metabarcoding reveals fine scale geographical differences of consumed algae in the Galápagos marine iguanas (Amblyrhynchus cristatus), Amphibia-Reptilia, 42(4): 471-480.

https://doi.org/10.1163/15685381-bja10070

Araya-Donoso R., Juan S., Tamburrino Í., Lamborot M., Veloso C., and Véliz D., 2021, Integrating genetics, physiology, and morphology to study desert adaptation in a lizard species, Journal of Animal Ecology, 91(6): 1148-1162.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13546

Blais B., Wells S., Poynter B., Harris T., Allard R., and Koprowski J., 2022, Bridging conservation across the ex situ–in situ spectrum: insights into the reproductive ecology of the threatened narrow-headed gartersnake (Thamnophis rufipunctatus), Zoo Biology, 42(3): 429-439.

https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21747

Brum P., Gonçalves S., Strüssmann C., and Teixido A., 2022, A global assessment of research on urban ecology of reptiles: patterns, gaps and future directions, Animal Conservation, 26(1): 1-13.

https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12799

Burriel-Carranza B., Tejero-Cicuéndez H., Carné A., Mochales-Riaño G., Talavera A., Saadi S., Els J., Šmíd J., Tamar K., Tarroso P., and Carranza S., 2024, Integrating genomics and biogeography to unravel the origin of a mountain biota: the case of a reptile endemicity hotspot in Arabia, Systematic Biology, 74(2): 230-249.

https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syae032

De Miranda E., 2017, The plight of reptiles as ecological actors in the tropics, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 5: 159.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00159

Derry A., Fraser D., Brady S., Astorg L., Lawrence E., Martin G., Matte J., Dastis J., Paccard A., Barrett R., Chapman L., Lane J., Ballas C., Close M., and Crispo E., 2019, Conservation through the lens of (mal)adaptation: concepts and meta-analysis, Evolutionary Applications, 12: 1287-1304.

https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12791

Dewoody J., Harder A., Mathur S., and Willoughby J., 2021, The long-standing significance of genetic diversity in conservation, Molecular Ecology, 30: 4147-4154.

https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16051

Dodge T., Farquharson K., Ford C., Cavanagh L., Schubert K., Schumer M., Belov K., and Hogg C., 2023, Genomes of two extinct-in-the-wild reptiles from Christmas Island reveal distinct evolutionary histories and conservation insights, Molecular Ecology Resources, 25(5): e13780.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13780

Delaney K., Busteed G., Fisher R., and Riley S., 2021, Reptile and amphibian diversity and abundance in an urban landscape: impacts of fragmentation and the conservation value of small patches, Ichthyology & Herpetology, 109: 424-435.

https://doi.org/10.1643/h2019261

Flanagan S., Forester B., Latch E., Aitken S., and Hoban S., 2017, Guidelines for planning genomic assessment and monitoring of locally adaptive variation to inform species conservation, Evolutionary Applications, 11: 1035-1052.

https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12569

Hu Y., Doherty T., and Jessop T., 2020, How influential are squamate reptile traits in explaining population responses to environmental disturbances?, Wildlife Research, 47: 249-259.

https://doi.org/10.1071/WR19064

Gonçalves-Souza T., Alves R., Albuquerque U., and Júnior W., 2022, Editorial: integrating traditional ecological knowledge into ecology, evolution, and conservation, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 10: 1015457.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.1015457

Gumbs R., Gray C., Böhm M., Hoffmann M., Grenyer R., Jetz W., Meiri S., Roll U., Owen N., and Rosindell J., 2020, Global priorities for conservation of reptilian phylogenetic diversity in the face of human impacts, Nature Communications, 11(1): 2616.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16410-6

Gutarra S., Stubbs T., Moon B., Heighton B., and Benton M., 2023, The locomotor ecomorphology of Mesozoic marine reptiles, Palaeontology, 66(2): e12645.

https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12645

Hu Y., Doherty T., and Jessop T., 2020, How influential are squamate reptile traits in explaining population responses to environmental disturbances?, Wildlife Research, 47: 249-259.

https://doi.org/10.1071/WR19064

Kay G., Barton P., Driscoll D., Cunningham S., Blanchard W., McIntyre S., and Lindenmayer D., 2016, Incorporating regional-scale ecological knowledge to improve the effectiveness of large-scale conservation programmes, Animal Conservation, 19(6), 515-525.

https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12267

Lamka G., and Willoughby J., 2023, Habitat remediation followed by managed connectivity reduces unwanted changes in evolutionary trajectory of high extirpation risk populations, PLOS ONE, 19(5): e0304276.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304276

Lewbart G., Cohen E., Hirschfeld M., Muñoz-Pérez J., García J., Fu A., Chen E., and Lohmann K., 2018, Field-based radiographic imaging of marine megafauna: marine iguanas (Amblyrhynchus cristatus) as a case study, Frontiers in Marine Science, 5: 40.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00040

Li Q., Shao W., Jiang Y., Yan C., and Liao W., 2024, Assessing reptile conservation status under global climate change, Biology, 13(6): 436.

https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13060436

MacLeod A., and Steinfartz S., 2016, The conservation status of the Galápagos marine iguanas, Amblyrhynchus cristatus: a molecular perspective, Amphibia-Reptilia, 37: 91-109.

https://doi.org/10.1163/15685381-00003035

MacLeod A., Koch V., García-Parra C., Trillmich F., and Steinfartz S., 2012, New highly polymorphic microsatellite loci for the Galápagos marine iguana, Amblyrhynchus cristatus, Amphibia-Reptilia, 33: 533-536.

https://doi.org/10.1163/15685381-00002854

MacLeod A., Rodríguez A., Vences M., Orozco-terWengel P., García C., Trillmich F., Gentile G., Caccone A., Quezada G., and Steinfartz S., 2015, Hybridization masks speciation in the evolutionary history of the Galápagos marine iguana, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1809): 20150425.

https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.0425

Markle C., Moore P., and Waddington J., 2020, Primary drivers of reptile overwintering habitat suitability: integrating wetland ecohydrology and spatial complexity, BioScience, 70: 597-609.

https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaa059

Mohanty N., Wagener C., Herrel A., and Thaker M., 2021, The ecology of sleep in non-avian reptiles, Biological Reviews, 97(2): 505-526.

https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12808

Mulhall S., Sitters H., and Stefano J., 2022, Vegetation cover and configuration drive reptile species distributions in a fragmented landscape, Wildlife Research, 50: 792-806.

https://doi.org/10.1071/WR21063

Nordstrom B., Mitchell N., Byrne M., and Jarman S., 2022, A review of applications of environmental DNA for reptile conservation and management, Ecology and Evolution, 12(6): e8995.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8995

Pabijan M., Palomar G., Antunes B., Antoł W., Zieliński P., and Babik W., 2020, Evolutionary principles guiding amphibian conservation, Evolutionary Applications, 13: 857-878.

https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12940

Paparella I., and Caldwell M., 2021, Cranial anatomy of the Galápagos marine iguana Amblyrhynchus cristatus (Squamata: Iguanidae), The Anatomical Record, 305: 1739-1786.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.24797

Perry S., and Mitchell M., 2021, Reptile assisted reproductive technologies: can ART help conserve 300 million years of evolution by preserving extant reptile biodiversity?, Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 34(5): 385-400.

https://doi.org/10.1071/RD21034

Razgour O., Taggart J., Manel S., Juste J., Ibáñez C., Rebelo H., Alberdi A., Jones G., and Park K., 2017, An integrated framework to identify wildlife populations under threat from climate change, Molecular Ecology Resources, 18: 18-31.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12694

Siler C., Lira‐Noriega A., and Brown R., 2014, Conservation genetics of Australasian sailfin lizards: flagship species threatened by coastal development and insufficient protected area coverage, Biological Conservation, 169: 100-108.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.10.014

Shaffer H., Gidiş M., McCartney-Melstad E., Neal K., Oyamaguchi H., Tellez M., and Toffelmier E., 2015, Conservation genetics and genomics of amphibians and reptiles, Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, 3: 113-138.

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-022114-110920

Szabo B., Noble D., and Whiting M., 2020, Learning in non-avian reptiles 40 years on: advances and promising new directions, Biological Reviews, 96(2): 331-356.

https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12658

Tingley R., Meiri S., and Chapple D., 2016, Addressing knowledge gaps in reptile conservation, Biological Conservation, 204: 1-5.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.07.021

Vasconcelos R., Razgour O., Tarroso P., Fasola M., Carranza S., and Alves P., 2018, Combining molecular and landscape tools for targeting evolutionary processes in reserve design: an approach for islands, PLOS ONE, 13(7): e0200830.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200830

Watanabe A., Fabre A., Felice R., Maisano J., Müller J., Herrel A., and Goswami A., 2019, Ecomorphological diversification in squamates from conserved pattern of cranial integration, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116: 14688-14697.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820967116